Larry Sinclair is having a bakeoff, and two of the tickets will be stellar winners of some pretty nifty prizes. I think it’s a worthy cause, I just bought some tickets myself.

Go look.

For $10.00 you can get a loaf of his spectacular one-of-a-kind home made banana bread and the chance to win something spectacular (a 32″ VIZIO LCD HDTV or a A PHILLIPS 1000 WATT HOME THEATRE SURROUND SOUND SYSTEM). This money will be going directly to his legal fund to pay for the legal filings, etc…and never even touches his hands.

In the event you don’t know about Larry, he is the fellow who has been trying to get a response from the Obama campaign about crack cocaine use in the back of a limo in 1999 after he’d said he stopped using drugs when he was younger. At this time, both Sinclair and Obama were 38 years old. This is a David and Goliath story, and Obama’s minions have done their best to obfuscate and lie about the facts, in addition to terrorize the guy with phone calls and accusations of being a mental patient and a load of other hogwash.

If you just want to go straight from here, use this link that goes to the Larry Sinclair Legal Fund at paypal.

Michelle Malkin dedicates this to Michelle Obama, who said “for the first time in my adult life, I’m proud of my country”…when it appeared as though Barack had a chance at the presidential office.This amazing slideshow is set to Taylor Hicks’ “Do I Make You Proud”?

TGIF!

Thank God I’m FREE! Thanks to guys like Jack Idema.

C’mon and trackback! Put up a post that you think deserves some special attention from this past week.

Watch for Open Trackbacks here on Fridays, Sundays and Wednesdays.

Here’s the link:

http://caosblog.com/7836

Here is the trackback link to this post:

http://caosblog.com/7836/trackback/

To trackback to any post just use the post slug or “permalink” and add trackback/ to the end of it.

One other thing.

I will be deleting trackbacks when the posts don’t show that you’ve linked here. Make sure you do as I did, below–either saying thanks to Cao’s blog and linking to this post, or mention that I have a trackback party, and link to this post. Otherwise the trackback will be deleted.

If you are unable to send trackbacks, then use the Wizbang Standalone Trackback Pinger.

Others with Open Trackbacks:

Add this Blogroll to your site

From the Confederate Yankee, who points out that Obamamaniacs would rather blame everyone else than recognize their candidate demeaned a grown woman. As is reported regularly at Dhimmi Watch, however, muslims treat women as second class citizens.

And so we get back to the ‘Obama is not a muslim” mantra, when the reality is sitting right in the symbolism of the emblem on his site.

We shouldn’t wonder about the tactics of a candidate who doesn’t bother to answer any questions. Think about Shepard Fairey; the artist who designed the official fund-raising set of Obama posters (Change, Hope, Progress), like this one:

Obama has written to Fairey that he admires “the political messages involved in your work.”

Fairey, as it turns out, has a company tellingly named “Obey” that produces his own artwork, such as these below.

“Obey” produces posters that depict the most infamous communist/socialist liars and murderers of all time, like Saddam Hussein - as heroes; and Obama is an “admirer”. Considering the massive propaganda campaigns that have accompanied all communist/socialist regimes, it is no wonder that Obama and his followers attack the messenger and demonize those who are attempting to look at Obama’s campaign in a rational way and ask questions.

Thus far, we are not a communist/socialist nation, although these illustrations spell out the “change” that Obama and his minions are striving for.

Have you heard? Obama is now wearing the US flag lapel pin, or at least a recognizable facsimile thereof.

I wonder if it shows the 57 Islamic states as the stars.

At least he’s paying attention at least in part, to what his detractors are saying. Now, if only he would answer Larry Sinclair’s allegations of homosexual sex and using crack cocaine in that limo in 1999.

This picture accompanied an endorsement of B.O. by the Oregon newspaper Willamette Week. (courtesy, Van Helsing)

As Van Helsing said here,

Just try exaggerating the absurdity of Barack O’Bigot and his moonbat supporters. It cannot be done.

The Marine Recruitering station in Berkeley reports that since the CodePinko witches flew in on their broomsticks, recruiting has gone up.

Read about one heroic young man who not only has taken Code Pink on, but has enlisted in the military as a result of his encounters with the Code Pink Moonbats at Mel’s.

An excerpt:

On the Brian Sussman show at KSFO in San Francisco this evening, Leigh’s grandmother called to say that after his last experience with the CodePinkos in Berkeley, Leigh reaching a tipping point in his seething with anger at the anti-war filth that swarmed the streets.

Wolf is two classes short of a college degree in broadcasting, but he came to the conclusion that he must show the rest of the country that there are young men and women of his generation who are STILL enlisting in the fight against Islamists in Iraq and other parts of the world.

So, this young man set aside his own aspirations, and has now formally enlisted in the military.

Crescent shapes with and without Islamic intent: the Obama logo example

The two most widely recognized symbols of Islam are the crescent and the sword. Kind of amusing that Barack Hussein Obama’s campaign logo can be seen to feature both a crescent and a curved Islamic scimitar:

The crescent shape in Obama’s logo has the round part on top, just like a traditional crescent shaped mihrab (the Mecca direction indicator around which every mosque is built). The animation shows the two most famous mihrabs in the world: the mihrab from the Great Mosque in Cordoba, and the Prophet’s mihrab in Medina.

The lighter vertical column in the center-bottom of the logo, presumably meant to indicate reflected light, even conveys the full vertical shape of a traditional mihrab. The scimitar in the animation is from the flag of the Bosnian regiment of the Nazi SS.

If Obama himself had come up with this crescent logo, one might suspect Islamic intent, given his Islamic heritage. But the logo was not designed by Obama. It was designed by a Chicago based branding firm named Sender, which claims credit for coming up with: “a white sunrise against a blue sky, over a landscape implied by red and white stripes.”

Obama definitely deserves to be made fun of for having a fairly obvious crescent shape in his logo, given his efforts to convince the public that he is not Muslim. This is already an uphill climb, when both his grandmother and his cousin are telling documented lies about their religion, claiming to be Christian in one venue while professing themselves Muslim in another. Lying about being Christian: it’s an Obama family tradition!

Still, there is no indication that the crescent and scimitar shapes in Obama’s logo are intended to convey any Islamic meaning. A genuine coincidence apparently. At the opposite pole is the Crescent of Embrace design for the Flight 93 memorial:

Contrast 1: Architect Paul Murdoch CALLS his crescent shaped memorial a crescent

The Crescent of Embrace name proves that the Flight 93 crescent was and is intended to be seen as a crescent. Only very reluctantly did the Memorial Project change the name, and the changes they made to the design are purely cosmetic. Every particle of the original Crescent of Embrace design remains completely intact in the Bowl of Embrace redesign.

Contrast 2: The Islamic symbolism is overt

It is not plausible that an architect, designing a memorial to people murdered by Islamic terrorists, could be oblivious to the fact that his memorial design is laid out in the shape of a bare naked Islamic crescent and star flag, readily identifiable as a crescent and star flag to airliners like Flight 93 passing overhead.

The Memorial Project simply assumes that the Islamic symbol shapes CAN’T be intentional, which is about like seeing an airliner fly into the World Trade Center and assuming it CAN’T be intentional. Do these people even remember the day they are supposed to be memorializing?

Contrast 3: The Flight 93 crescent contains still further Islamic symbolism

It turns out that the giant crescent points to Mecca. A crescent that Muslims face into to face Mecca is a well known structure in the Islamic world. It is a mihrab (as seen in the above animation), which gives the direction that Muslims are to face for prayer.

Everyone at the Memorial Project is fully aware that a person facing into the giant crescent will be facing almost exactly at Mecca. This according to Flight 93 Advisory Commission member Tim Baird. Again, they all just assume that this MUST be an innocent mistake (the equivalent of seeing as SECOND airliner fly into the Trade Center, and STILL assuming it can’t POSSIBLY be intentional).

Contrast 4: Proof of intent

Paul Murdoch PROVES that the Mecca orientation is intentional by repeating it in the crescents of trees that surround the minaret like Tower of Voices. Below is an animated run-through of the repeated Mecca-orientations (2 minutes).

You can restart the animation by refreshing the page:

Animated GIF: copy and paste. You can email it! (Animation restarts each time email is opened.) Click image for larger animation, if your connection is fast enough (1MB).

Crescent of Embrace site-plan, showing both the central crescent and the Tower of Voices, here.

Contrast 5: the designer’s own thematic description is clearly terrorist memorializing

The designers of Obama’s logo offer a clearly innocent thematic description of their creation. You can tell just by looking at it what it is MEANT to signify: a white sun coming up into a blue sky over red and white rows of fruited plain. Even the uncanny intimation of the vertical sides of a traditional mihrab are fully explained by the “sun” reflecting off the red and white “landscape.”

In contrast, Paul Murdoch’s thematic account of his design is as nakedly pro-terrorist as his crescent and star layout. Murdoch says that the crescent comes from the terrorists breaking the circle. That is, they broke our liberty-loving circle, and turn it into a giant Islamic-shaped Mecca-oriented crescent.

As Tom Burnett Sr. put it in his letter to American people, asking for help with our petition to keep the crescent design off of his murdered son’s gravesite:

I don’t want to celebrate the terrorist’s circle-breaking crescent-creating feat.

And lest anyone thinks that the giant crescent is no longer present, the Park Service website makes clear that, while the redesign looks more like a circle, the circle is still broken:

The circle is broken in two places that mark the southeastern path of the plane to the crash site. The circle is broken at the entry to the memorial and at the crash site.

The breaks are in the exact same places as before and the unbroken part of the circle (the crescent) remains completely unchanged. It it still points to Mecca. It is still the world’s largest mihrab by a factor of a hundred. The only difference is that now a chunk of the broken off part of the circle is included in the design, which is perfectly consistent with its original terrorist memorializing theme. The terrorists still break our liberty-loving circle and still turn it into a giant Mecca-oriented crescent.

So there you have it. Dueling crescents! Obama’s crescent logo exemplifies innocent coincidence (however guilty Obama may be of lying about his religion). In contrast, the Flight 93 crescent exemplifies proven intent. (More of architect Paul Murdoch’s endless proofs of intent here and here.)

To join our blogbursts, just send your blog’s url.

It’s Thursday, folks, I missed posting this yesterday AGAIN—too much going on. Cheers to the mid-week trackback party, a little late.

Trackback with one of your posts that you think deserves some special attention from this past week.

Watch for Open Trackbacks here on Fridays, Sundays and Wednesdays.

Here is the trackback link to this post:

http://caosblog.com/7823/trackback/

To trackback to any post just use the post slug or “permalink” and add trackback/ to the end of it.

One other thing.

I will be deleting trackbacks when the posts don’t show that you’ve linked here. Make sure you do as I did, below–either saying thanks to Cao’s blog and linking to this post, or mention that I have a trackback party, and link to this post. Otherwise the trackback will be deleted.

If you are unable to send trackbacks, then use the Wizbang Standalone Trackback Pinger.

Others holding trackback parties:

Add this Blogroll to your site

Beyonce’s new brand of pedophilia chic-by Michelle Malkin is all over the internet. Human Events, CNS, GOP USA, Townhall.com - it’s all over the place. To me, the outrage in response to these fashions should be universal.

The difference between Michelle Malkin’s website and the rest of the places where this article appears are the pictures she has up of these fashions at her website - which don’t appear in the other article reprints. Make sure you check out those pictures at Michelle Malkin dot com.

WND noted in April that moms are taking their kids to beauty parlors to have them waxed and plucked; for microderm abrasion treatments, etc.

Quoted in that article was Carrie Denny, from Philadelphia Magazine:

“Over the past few years, we’ve seen a tidal wave of this rising luxury-class culture – you’ve seen it in these pages, manifested in reports of $80,000 ‘push presents,’ lavish condo buildings sprouting up like beanstalks, and weekends spent stockpiling couture with on-call personal shoppers. But just when we thought this consumerist takeover couldn’t get any worse, here comes the trend’s newest tributary: The kids of the pampered are being taken along for the ride, without a backward glance at the childhood left behind,” she wrote.

These “trends” are disgusting. And I thought the Madonna fashions years ago were outrageous. Michelle’s article talks about a real-life family whose daughter was dressed up in spike heels and did a pole dance with the full encouragement of her family.

To think that as a culture these things are not only acceptable but encouraged makes me sick to my stomach.

It says “Debunking Military Lies”, but it seems as though they don’t have enough smarts to get their facts straight. It’s always been a mystery to me as to how people would willingly become anti-American communists. When I was growing up, I learned about Lenin, Stalin, and communists in general through the heartfelt testimony of Reverend Wurmbrand, who was imprisoned by the communists in Romania and withstood the most horrible torture, and emotional and physical hardships. Now I see this same mentality in the communists who blindly stand up and cheer for complaints against our government and its handling of Iraq at the Winter Soldier II Investigation, much like the old time Russians of the Soviet Union. “Communist Propaganda” was something I REALLY learned about. And it’s sad, really, that we have to battle people of that ideological stripe who are working from within to destroy us for the idea of a utopia that will never be, as history has clearly illustrated for us.

In this post, Chicken Hawks and Critics in the Blogosphere they confuse Jonn Lilya from “This Ain’t Hell but you can see it from here” and Robin at “Chickenhawk Express.”…characterizing the articles written at Robin’s as the same as those written at Jonn’s.

There is a difference between the two that they seem to have missed over there. One is a man, one is a woman; they are two different blogs. “This ain’t hell” is written by a guy who spent 20 years in the infantry and volunteered to go active last year, for crying out loud - he’s probably the furthest from a ‘chickenhawk’ that you can possibly get.

John responds with, Do your research, IVAW

The articles they cite in that post are from Robin’s, but the last one they throw in to illustrate their point about Jonn Lilya and the evil Chickenhawk Express is from Jonn’s. It may have escaped their watchdog eyes, but they’re not one-in-the-same. And if they’re all so concerned about those ‘critics’, why don’t they throw in Denis Keohane’s website Obiter Dictum, or the Thus Spake Ortner at the Sniper? Or Rurik at Veteran American Voices, a Vietnam Veteran? After all, TSO at the Sniper and Rurik at Veteran American Voices together with Jonn, were three bloggers who attended and covered the lies told IVAW’s Winter Soldier II Investigation, and continue to keep a watchful eye on their antics before the Congressional Progressive Caucus.

The hilarity ensues…

MJ and Jake do a great job on this every week. See them at Freedom Folks.

A baby girl, from what I gather - Kender just spoke with him. Go here to wish them well in comments and congratulate Jay, although I think we should also mention that mom was in labor on mother’s day….and deserves some kudos for doing all the work.

So does he think that’s what he’s running for, or what? It’s just interesting that he would make such an interesting faux pas; considering he has three muslim names, his muslim background, the fact that he claims he’s a Christian and nobody is calling for his death as an apostate from Islam, etc.

Here’s the link to the article at the International Humanist and Ethical Union.

And here again is Obama with the freudian slip talking about the 57 Islamic United States.

My previous post: Obama wants to be president of 57 states. Jay had it had this at Stop the ACLU

President Apostate?
By EDWARD N. LUTTWAK
Published: May 12, 2008
New York Times

In Islam, however, there is no such thing as a half-Muslim. Like all monotheistic religions, Islam is an exclusive faith.

As the son of the Muslim father, Senator Obama was born a Muslim under Muslim law as it is universally understood. It makes no difference that, as Senator Obama has written, his father said he renounced his religion. Likewise, under Muslim law based on the Koran his mother’s Christian background is irrelevant.

Of course, as most Americans understand it, Senator Obama is not a Muslim. He chose to become a Christian, and indeed has written convincingly to explain how he arrived at his choice and how important his Christian faith is to him.

His conversion, however, was a crime in Muslim eyes; it is “irtidad” or “ridda,” usually translated from the Arabic as “apostasy,” but with connotations of rebellion and treason. Indeed, it is the worst of all crimes that a Muslim can commit, worse than murder (which the victim’s family may choose to forgive).

Actually, I don’t think he’s an apostate at all.

That an Obama presidency would cause such complications in our dealings with the Islamic world is not likely to be a major factor with American voters, and the implication is not that it should be. But of all the well-meaning desires projected on Senator Obama, the hope that he would decisively improve relations with the world’s Muslims is the least realistic.

I don’t think the Islamic world views it that way, otherwise there would have been a fatwa against him, like there was from the Islamic world against Salman Rushdie.

Obama’s “slips” have been very revealing in this respect. For example, when he said we would go after Israel (even with nukes) if Iran fell under attack- and his claim in the Audacity of Hope - that if it got ugly, he would side with the muslims - Hamas’ support, when he said the muslim call to prayer was the sweetest sound on earth, Hezbollah’s support ad infinitum from radical muslim organizations including even Calypso Louis Farrakhan’s endorsement- is all we need to know about what lies in his heart. And in the Islamic world, that is what is important.

I don’t think the situation for Obama can get any worse. Haven’t we listed just about every terrorist organization in history is in support of Barack Obama–marxist, socialist, Islamic, you name it - he has their endorsement.

In “Obama’s Church Printed Pro-Hezbollah Articles“, Steve Gilbert outlines the reason why the Trinity Church of Christ printed those Pro-Hezbollah Articles: Obama and Wright were on Hezbollah’s side during Israel’s limited incursion into Lebanon two summers ago.

It defies reason that “Christ” is in that church’s name. I could think of a lot of other names that would be more fitting.

A prayer for Jack Idema from Fahim:

You fought for the people who were left so behind..You fought for the women who were treated like slaves…You fought for the children who were sexually attacked….You fought for a country and freed it as well…You fought for America to stop the terror…I will pray for you Jack, with my every breath…You are a hero and will be always.

It is customary on Sundays for me to offer up a prayer for Jack and Brent and that they’re both able to return home to the United States safely and without repurcussions from our government for doing the job they were sent to do…

If they’re not appreciated by our own government, it is good to know that Afghanistanis appreciate them for what they did and how they sacrificed for the people and women of Afghanistan.

Trackback with one of your posts that you think deserves some special attention from this past week.

Watch for Open Trackbacks here on Fridays, Sundays and Wednesdays.

Here is the trackback link to this post:

http://caosblog.com/7814/trackback/

To trackback to any post just use the post slug or “permalink” and add trackback/ to the end of it.

One other thing.

I will be deleting trackbacks when the posts don’t show that you’ve linked here. Make sure you do as I did, below–either saying thanks to Cao’s blog and linking to this post, or mention that I have a trackback party, and link to this post. Otherwise the trackback will be deleted.

If you are unable to send trackbacks, then use the Wizbang Standalone Trackback Pinger.

Others holding trackback parties:

Add this Blogroll to your site

From the Confederate Yankee and Times UK Online:

“Barack Obama sacks adviser over talks with Hamas”

Reliably, the Obama Middle East Policy Advisor only met with Hamas because he belongs to a “peace outfit” - a leftist crazy ‘conflict resolution’ think tank. Isn’t it interesting that Obama would fire someone for participating in talks with Hamas when Obama said he would “negotiate” with them?

Obama has said:

And what we should be doing is reaching out aggressively to our allies, but also talking to our enemies and focusing on those areas where we do not accept their actions, whether it be terrorism or developing nuclear weapons, but also talking to Iran directly about the potential carrots that we can provide in terms of them being involved in the World Trade Organization, or beginning to look at the possibilities of diplomatic relations being normalized.

So he wants to negotiate with terrorists.

The president has to lead that diplomacy, which is why I’ve said I would convene a meeting of Muslim leaders upon taking office because I think we have to send a strong signal that we are willing to listen and not just talk, and certainly not just dictate or engage in military action.

There again he’s all about negotiating with terrorists.

From Powerline on Hamas’ endorsement of Obama:

[…] Aaron Klein and John Batchelor interviewed Ahmed Yousef, chief political adviser to the Prime Minister of Hamas, on WABC radio. The interview produced a scoop which, for some reason, has not been widely publicized: Hamas has endorsed Barack Obama for President. Yousef said, “We like Mr. Obama and we hope he will win the election.” Why? “He has a vision to change America.” Maybe Yousef has some insight into what Obama means by all these vague references to “change.”

He and his PR people certainly want it to APPEAR as though they’re outraged over a campaign worker talking with Hamas. What really matters is what lies in your heart. John Hawkins asks an interesting question:

Now that prominent members of Hamas are endorsing Obama, can Hizbollah and Al-Qaeda be far behind?

“Change you can believe in”. That slogan is starting to invoke immediate fits of uncontrollable laughter from me whenever I hear it now.

CY: [Obama] kicks off his political career by attending a fundraiser in the home of a pair of well-known and infamous domestic terrorists that led a group that had targeted and in some cases killed American citizens, including off-duty soldiers and police officers. When this association is highlighted, he labels it a “distraction.”

[…]That’s not change you can believe in. That’s moral cowardice and craven opportunism.

Exactly.

And to all you other moms out there, Happy Mother’s Day!

And wishing Jay and his growing family all the best, as his wife is in the early stages of labor.

“Nessun dorma! Nessun dorma! Tu pure, o Principessa, nella tua fredda stanza, guardi le stelle che tremano d’amore, e di speranza!”

(English translation: “None shall sleep! None shall sleep! Even you, o Princess, in your cold bedroom, watch the stars that tremble with love and with hope”)

“Ma il mio mistero è chiuso in me; il nome mio nessun saprà! No, No! Sulla tua bocca lo dirò quando la luce splenderà!”

(English translation: “But my secret is hidden within me; none will know my name! No, no! On your mouth I will say it when the light shines!”)

“Ed il mio bacio scioglierà il silenzio che ti fa mia!”

(English translation: “And my kiss will dissolve the silence that makes you mine!”)

Just before the climactic end of the aria, a chorus of women is heard singing in the distance:

“Il nome suo nessun saprà… E noi dovrem, ahimè, morir, morir!”

(English translation: “No one will know his name… and we will have to, alas, die, die!”)

Calaf, now certain of victory, sings:

“Dilegua, o notte! Tramontate, stelle! Tramontate, stelle! All’alba vincerò! Vincerò! Vincerò!”

(English translation: “Vanish, o night! Set, stars! Set, stars! At daybreak I shall win! I shall win! I shall win!”)

Maybe I’m just getting cynical…or old…or it’s a combination of the ridiculous versus the sublime. Being that I mostly see ridiculous anymore and very little of the sublime, here’s the article from Lifenews.

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) — With Mother’s Day coming up this weekend, Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest abortion business, has a message for moms: send us more money. Cecile Richards, the president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, sent out a fund-raising request this week one pro-life advocate says is grotesque.

Which it is, of course. The organization that was created in order to kill black babies - by Margaret Sanger, a communist…should be embarrassed about fundraising around a day that they deny their clients…MOTHER’s DAY. The clients don’t get to become mothers because their babies are killed, and the babies are killed, and deprived of life altogether. Mother’s day honors women who’ve actually carried babies to term.

Richards honored Mother’s Day by sharing part of an editorial her daughter wrote saying she got her pro-abortion views from her mother and grandmother, former Texas Gov. Ann Richards.

“It’s true that I have had lots of rewarding moments in my career. So did my mother,” Cecile wrote in the email LifeNews.com obtained. “But knowing that my daughter is carrying on the legacy of fighting that my mother passed to me trumps ‘em all.”

I’m not sure what that means…at least she LIVED. There is at least a quarter of a generation of people missing from our society now, as a result of their disastrous policy of murdering innocents.

Richard couldn’t wait until the third paragraph of her Mother’s Day letter to PPFA supporters to ask them to open their wallets.

“This Mother’s Day, I’m honoring that legacy with a Planned Parenthood Federation of America Mother’s Day gift. Join me,” she wrote.

“Honor that legacy” with a “gift”???? Tell me what kind of picture that brings up in your mind.

“You can help with a gift to Planned Parenthood Federation of America today in honor of your mother or daughter, and on behalf of all the women,” she added.

Pro-life blogger Jill Stanek called Richard’s exploitation of Mother’s Day for pro-abortion money-making purposes “grotesque” and said she couldn’t believe Richards would stoop to “using her dead mother and daughter as props.”

Read the whole thing.

Is Obama Caught up in Gay Murder Scandal? - Larry Sinclair

He starts out with Boycott Oprah Winfrey. And talks about “the trinity of Hell”…which he characterizes as Obama, Wright and Winfrey. This is amazing. He talks about how white folks lovingly promoted Winfrey when she was a struggling actress and radio talkshow host.

But he also talks about Soros funding Obama, and that Winfrey disavowed the white folks who supported her. He says Obama is “a long-legged pimp.”…and that Winfrey, Obama and Wright are homosexuals.

It can’t get much more rich than this…

I’m on with Jake and MJ from Freedom Folks- about their May day encounter with the commies and Che fans. The show starts at 3:00 Central standard time. The segment is here if you want to get in on the chat room.

Sign up for an account on blog talk radio. You don’t need to be a host to have an account.

Call-in number: (347) 326-9917

Here’s the video of Shaun Harkin, socialist thug.

Here’s their channel on youtube.

Like we’ve been saying…dumbed down for socialism/marxism, etc.

From Stop the ACLU